Approach & Strategy

We do not parachute in. We co-design, then step back.

Working in a fragile, conflict-affected context means methodology is not academic — it is the difference between a program that survives a difficult season and one that does not.

Our methodology

A four-step cycle, repeated for every program

The same sequence underlies every ACV pillar, whether it is a tree nursery, a savings cooperative or a health volunteer network.

01

Listen & co-design

Every program begins with community consultation — local leaders, schools, farmer groups and health committees help define the problem before we define the solution.

02

Build local capacity

We train local leaders, volunteers and committees to run the activity themselves, rather than running it for them indefinitely.

03

Implement & adapt

Programs launch at a deliberately small scale, with short feedback loops that let us adjust before scaling up.

04

Monitor & sustain

Indicators tied to our M&E Framework track whether outcomes are holding once direct support steps back.

Conflict-sensitive by design, not by accident
Working in a fragile context

Conflict-sensitivity is a design input, not an afterthought

Programs operating around Goma and Virunga National Park have to account for displacement, insecurity and shifting access — conditions that can change a plan mid-implementation.

We design for that reality: smaller pilot scales before expansion, local leadership that can keep a program running if outside staff cannot reach a site, and a standing Risk Register reviewed across program areas. Do-no-harm and safeguarding considerations are part of program design from the first conversation, not a compliance step added at the end.

Who we work with

Four kinds of partnership, one shared goal

No single actor — least of all ACV alone — can deliver community-led development. Each partnership type plays a distinct role.

Communities & local leaders

The starting point for every program decision — not a stakeholder group consulted after the plan is made.

Local & traditional authorities

Coordination with administrative and traditional leadership keeps programs aligned with local governance and genuinely conflict-sensitive.

NGOs & institutional partners

Technical co-design, funding partnerships and shared learning with organisations working across the same sectors.

Diaspora & technical volunteers

Congolese diaspora professionals and technical volunteers contribute specialist skills, often remotely.

See it in practice

Where this approach shows up

The same four-step cycle and conflict-sensitive design run through every program pillar.

Browse the programs

See how listening, local capacity and adaptive delivery show up pillar by pillar.

View programs

Read our governance

How risk, safeguarding and accountability are structured above the program level.

See governance

Discuss a partnership

Bring a technical or funding partnership that fits this model.

Start a conversation